[Concordia] Concordia call tomorrow (Tuesday), 22 Jan 2008, 10am Pacific

Paul Madsen paulmadsen at rogers.com
Tue Jan 22 11:42:02 EST 2008


Hi Scott, I've definitely been going on assumption that it was 
AuthnContextClassRef URIs only, (and nor do we need to attempt to define 
the class schemas . Every demo has its dirty secrets, we can just add 
this to the list )

paul


Scott Cantor wrote:
>> . Scott to update the scenario detail on the wiki and refactor the
>> wiki a bit.
>>     
>
> Paul did most of this, but I took a pass over it this morning to flesh out
> some things:
>
> http://projectconcordia.org/index.php/Infocard_Authentication_Scenario_Detai
> ls
>
> I will add a separate page with a complete SAML assertion example to fulfill
> the other action item, but the interop-relevant parts are shown in the
> examples here.
>
> I have a couple of questions, but I'll hold off until the call. We also need
> somebody from the Infocard side of things to flesh out the details there.
> One of these days I'll read the profile.
>
> I think I also had an AI to point Mike's ADFS people at the part of SAML
> that pertains to authentication context during SSO. Those would be sections
> 2.7.2.2 and 3.3.2.2.1 of SAML 2.0 core.
>
> I believe the interop will probably be confined to using class references
> rather than full declarations (AuthnContextClassRef).
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community at projectconcordia.org
> http://lists.projectconcordia.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
> Participating in this discussion list does not grant any intellectual property rights or any commitment by the participants of the content discussed to any organization.
>
>
>   

-- 
Paul Madsen             e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com
NTT                     p:613-482-0432
                        m:613-282-8647
                        aim:PaulMdsn5
                        web:connectid.blogspot.com 




More information about the Community mailing list